Whilst
experimenting with these vastly different “genre generators”, I found that as
different as their subject matter is, they are all working towards a similar
goal: to appeal to their specific audience in a way that humorously conveys a
similar state of mind. This may seem like a verbose introduction, but I will
elaborate on my basic meaning as this piece progresses.
Beginning
my exploration of the world of “genre generators”, I arrived at the most basic
and currently popular of websites, the meme generator. I can almost guarantee that if you walked out
of your front door right this instant, located a teen between the ages of, say,
13 and 23, and asked them what a meme was, they could pull one up on their
phone within seconds. Now, one could argue with me and say “Yeah well anyone
can google anything these days.” To which I would respond with “You, sir, are a
gentleman and a scholar!” Yes, that is correct, anyone with a smartphone in
hand could punch in the word “meme” on google and find thousands of words and
images. However, that is not quite what I’m getting at here. My point is this:
that if a young person hears the word “meme” they each have that one specific
photo and set of words that tickles their funny bone; be it a photo of Tommy
Lee Jones glancing condescendingly over his newspaper, or a stick figure with
its hand punching straight through its face. And with each of these photos
there is a conventional set of words which, when looking at the photos, most
youth of today can call upon their memories and generate some set of words that
correlates with any meme utilizing that specific photo. For example, a stick
figure with its hand through its face? The words “facepalm” automatically come
to mind. Another example might be Jonathan Goldsmith at his desk next to a
bottle of Dos Equis, and I can confidently state that whatever group of words
anyone puts over that photo, it will begin with “I don’t always…” and end with
“but when I do, I…”. Zooming out to focus on the bigger picture here, some
basic conventions of such memes are that they are almost always humorous in
nature, and usually pertain to a single social interaction. The use of sarcasm
and double entendre are two other conventions that run rampant throughout the
meme-creating world.
With that last
note on memes, I will shift over to my next generator, the comic strips. Similar
in nature to the meme generator, the website pandyland.net/random has the goal
of making its audience laugh. However the conventions of this generator have a
slightly different tone than the meme generator. Some conventions of this comic
strip generator are: vulgar and insensitive humor, references to currently
popular phrases and/or songs such as “I just met you, and this is crazy, but…”
(Which is a reference to the song “Call Me, Maybe”, but my guess is that you
already knew that.), and references to popular social media sites such as
twitter and Instagram. One can see that
these comic strips too are targeting a younger, more involved with the
internet, audience. Another convention that separates this website from the
rest is the making humorous of things that are not normally socially accepted
as being found funny. For example, the words “simon noooo” followed by the
other character hanging himself. This is placed here for humor where most
wouldn’t think something of this nature to be funny. It is a very dry and
somewhat distasteful type of humor but placed there for humor nonetheless.
The last generator
is unlike the other two entirely. This generates very serious groups of text
and are generally in the format of a scientific paper rather than a short group
of words accompanying a picture. Here the purpose is to sound intelligent
without actually having any facts backing the paper. Some conventions of this
generator would be long groups of verbosely worded text that, for lack of a
better description, “says a lot without actually saying anything.” For example,
an excerpt from one randomly generated paper reads “a significant riddle in
machine learning is the deployment of flip-flop gates”. The text is cleverly
places to sound academic but holds no factual truths. Conventionally, these
papers contain a lot of large nonsensical words, photo and graphs not backed by
any real facts but which look realistic without any close analyzing, and the
paper is concluded by a large group of “sources” that most likely do not
actually exist. All three of these generators, though different in content,
serve the same purpose of helping their audience better understand the concept
of “genre”. Each one emphasizes a specific pattern and follows a certain type
of diction that remain consistent. They each establish their own set of
conventions and remain true to them with each new generated set of text. The
repetition here helps nail down the concept of conventions as patterns that
serve to make each genre clear-cut and easily recognizable.
Syd the Kid,
ReplyDeleteI like the “look” of your blog and I think that the videos/pictures/multimedia helps bring it to life. And hey, if “stream of consciousness” is what you want to do, this blog is a perfect opportunity to do that. Explore! (Don’t forget, though: “stream away” all you want, but make sure to answer the main PB questions. It looks like you’re doing this just fine, so nothing to worry about.)
PB1A: I like this because it’s an outside-the-box pick, but I’ve got a couple questions. Did you chose, specifically, the YouTube cover videos as a genre? Or just… other(?) cover videos? The reason why I’m asking is because if it is YouTube, then you want to make sure that you’re acknowledging the conventions of a standard YouTube page—ie, titles, song length, advertisements, captions, comments, etc. These all play a part in understanding the genre in its totality. Also, I don’t know if I agree that everybody is trying to IMPROVE the original song by covering it. Can’t they just be… playing it for playing it’s sake?
PB1B: You gave this a lot of thought, and what I liked most was how you tied in your observations to specific examples/evidence (ie, the Tommy Lee/Goldsmith references. However, I want you to remember that it’s important for us to take a look at “every little thing” that exists in these genres.
For the meme: what kinds of pictures are typically used? Can you characterize them, generally, in any kind of way? You get at it a bit here: “ they are almost always humorous in nature, and usually pertain to a single social interaction.” Also, if you look at it super-closely/deeply, you’ll notice that they’ve got a pretty standard setup/punchline (top/bottom).
I like how you were tied your claims about the comic generators to specific examples: that’s the evidence I’m looking for.
All told, nice work, Syd!
Grade for both PBs: 4.5/5
PB1A: “Check/check minus.”
PB1B: “Check.”
Z
I liked how in your introduction you mention how the genre generators would have a similar goal; I now would notice that the generators would have something in common. I like the analysis you wrote on the meme generator, it does look like you had some fun experimenting with this generator. And to tell you the truth, the meme generator is my favorite generator out of the three generators we had to experiment with. I noticed you did not write as much analysis with the comic strip so I can tell you did not enjoy this generator as much. In the last generator you write about, I noticed you started to get serious while writing about this genre generator. But overall, you did do a good job analyzing the three genre generators, but maybe you should include a conclusion paragraph to make the blog look more like a short essay.
ReplyDelete