1. What did you think about yesterday's peer reader/review sesh? Better/worse/same as the old "hard copy" one? Explain!
A: I personally felt more productive simply for the fact that I could type my notes which goes quicker than usual. Had I only had a pencil and paper to do this review with, it would have gone much slower and I would have been unable to give as much detailed feedback as I did. All that being said, I don't think it was better for every kind of class, because when I was typing up notes, Senor De Piero didn't like it much and seemed to feel I wasn't paying attention, so maybe it's not so good for him.
2. How did WP2 go? Happy with? Not happy with? Why?
A: I was really happy with my structure this time around. I felt like there was a lot more flow to my paper than the previous WP. I also felt more confident in the points where I applied my own analysis as well as the places where I cited other sources. It was, I'm hoping, a pretty big improvement.
3. Which comments were most helpful to you? Why?
A: There were lots of very helpful comments about the structure of my intro and first body paragraph, which I have always had trouble with, so it was really helpful to see it from another persons perspective. I also received some positive feedback on the ways in which I inserted our readings and my sources into my piece, so it is good to see that I'm improving there. Also just the small, nit-picky comments really help me because I myself am that way when I read, so having someone else provide that type of feedback benefited me immensely.
No comments:
Post a Comment